Technology has ushered in a new era of home entertainment and many individuals are jumping on board. Having the ability to stream your favorite television show or hit movie seamlessly at your own leisure is certainly engaging. While it is easy to see what all the fuss is about, it is necessary for anyone making the switch to streaming, be knowledgeable about which device would work best for them.
There are a number of streaming devices on the market today and all of them have varying features that may or may not make them suitable for one’s household. Two of those streaming devices are the Amazon Fire TV as well as the Apple TV that I cant help but mention has an awesome review and comparison in allpowermoves.com. Both units do share some similarities, though they are also vastly different in many other ways. Both the Apple TV and the Amazon Fire TV are giants in their industry and the pair equally consider themselves to be brands of the people. Both of the units are comparable in size and will fit neatly under your TV; customers likely will have no need to rearrange anything in order to make room for either one.
The hook-ups are also similar in these devices in many ways as both have HDMI and Ethernet connections. Perhaps the first significant distinction between these devices however, is one that could definitely be persuasive for advocating one over the other. The Amazon Fire TV has a USB port and a MicroSD card slot for expansive storage space; while the Apple TV has a USB_C port that is only used for service and support. This discrepancy means that if a customer has any interest in downloading a lot of games and applications, then the Amazon Fire could be the way to go. There are other differences between the two in regards to their design as well, as this one may be a game changer for some and not so much for the other consumers.
The remote controls for each are constructed very differently and each is unique in its own way. Amazon Fire has a design that is tailored to the everyday customer in that it has a very simple layout that is easy for one to familiarize themselves with. On the other hand, the Apple TV chose to go a different route in terms of their creative process when it comes to the remote. Their remote is much appeasing to look at and looks much more like a control from the future than does the one Amazon provides.
The way that each remote works is different as well, as the look of each goes a long way in telling the story in terms of how simple they are to use. Apple and its elaborate design also come with a fancy way of working the remote, as it features a swipe pad that may remind someone of a tablet. The Amazon Fire has the basic old fashioned buttons that have been around on remotes going back to the invention of the television itself. Deciding which remote you prefer could help go a long way in deciding which unit you want, as it is all about what each individual customer prefers.
The set-up process for these two are different as well, as the Amazon Fire once again offers a very simple process in order to get started. Simply log in and watch a tutorial video and learn all there is to know about your device, while Apple once again offers a more sophisticated approach to get things going. To set up your Apple TV you must activate Bluetooth on a separate device and place it next to the unit itself. After that, the Apple TV will copy all of your account information and then you will be all set. Again, it simply comes down to which approach would be best suited for each individual customer. Navigation in both devices is very instinctive and just takes a little getting used to, as going from cable to streaming can be a culture shock for some. Many believe that the Apple TV has better on screen graphics which may be appealing to anyone looking to do a lot of gaming on the device. However, if straight up content is more important, then Amazon offers a much wider selection in that category.
Joomla is an open source content management system that enables users to build websites and online applications. A content management system keeps track of everything on a Web site, which allows easy tracking of text, photos, music, video, and virtually any content that can be imagined. An advantage of using such content management systems such as Joomla is that users do not need much technical skill or knowledge to build Web sites and applications. Joomla is currently used all over the world in different Web sites from personal homepages to corporate Web sites. Some organizations that use Joomla are MTV Networks, IHOP, Harvard University, Citibank, The Green Maven, Outdoor Photographer, and Senso Interiors.
Joomla started as a copy of Mambo, another content management system, in 2005. The initial released was released on September 22, 2005, as an improvement of Mambo with bug and security fixes. Joomla 1.5 was released on January 22 in 2008, which was the first to attain long term support. The next release, Joomla 1.6, added a improvements for functionality and administrators. The most recent release, Joomla 3.0, was released on September 27 of 2012.
Joomla is written in PHP and uses object-oriented programming techniques for easy and advanced control. It also uses MySQL databases to store data. Some features supported in Joomla are RSS feeding, page caching, news flashing, blogging, and polling. It also supports language internationalization for websites that aim to attract visitors from different countries. Joomla uses templates to build a pre-designed website that can later be edited by users modifying text and images. These customizable and flexible templates determine the website’s style.
Joomla has been downloaded over 30 million times as of March 2012. As the most popular open source content management system, it is offered for use by many web hosting services. Users just need to click a button to install Joomla on their Web site; setting up the website only takes a few minutes. With minimal guidance, users can easily manage their sites by themselves. For advanced users, Joomla offers thousands of extensions that can significantly add functionality in Joomla. For example, developers can implement inventory control systems, data reporting tools, e-commerce systems, complex business directories, reservation systems, and communication tools by using Joomla’s powerful application framework. For more hosting related reviews click here and see some of the latest reviews about different web hosting.
Determining the bandwidth needed for your web hosting doesn’t have to be a challenge! Thankfully, there are some very simple and basic things to consider. Bandwidth is measured in bits per second, but due to modern speeds, is usually measured regarding Megabits or Gigabits per second. When setting up your website, you will have to choose from a variety of hosting plans, and you may not be sure about which one is right for you.
Most plans are based on the amount of bandwidth used in a month, rather than a year. Some hosting providers will allow you to change your plan from month to month, while others will lock you in for a year. So if you aren’t certain about which plan to choose, it’s usually best to size up. Some bandwidth sites have calculators that will allow you to estimate what you need, but for those that don’t, there are other ways to come up with a valid estimate.
How much traffic do you believe your site will be getting? If there’s been a lot of interest in your business, it’s reasonable to expect that your site will gain a lot of interest, too. Conversely, if you’re a start-up, or if your site is a personal blog, it may not receive much attention at first. And if you’re switching hosting providers, you may already have a good idea of the bandwidth your site will need. You want to be realistic, but you also want to leave your site room to grow! When determining how much bandwidth you need, you should also consider the type of site you are building. If your site offers a lot of downloads, you will require more bandwidth. You will also need to find if people plan on looking at more pages, or staying for a long time, which will use more bandwidth.
After your site has begun to grow, you may start looking for a dedicated server hosting plans. While dedicated server hosting costs a bit more than shared hosting, it is often worth the additional cost for medium to large sites. Whether it is worth, the cost to you will depend on your particular site and needs.
A dedicated server means that you have your own server, or virtual server, setup just for your particular site. This is very useful if your site gets more traffic than a regular shared hosting plan allows. A dedicated server hosting plan can sometimes even be cheaper in these cases (consider the costs of going over your minutes on your cellular phone plan, as the same type of thing can apply to a shared server hosting plans). Another advantage of a dedicated server is that you have full control over what is installed on the server. Pretty much any host shared or dedicated, will have Apache, MySQL, and PHP available. But if you want something more esoteric (custom seed CGIs, dedicated SSL FTP access, or your custom programs), then you need to have a dedicated server. Since you control the whole server, you can install any of these programs that you might need to do whatever your site has to do. Now, of course, the flipside, is that then you are responsible for maintaining all of this additional software and the necessary patching. This can be a full-time job all by itself, even if you just have a few servers. If you are using a shared hosting solution, this isn’t the case, as management of all the software is covered as part of your monthly fees.
Dedicated server hosting plans have distinct advantages but will cost you a bit more money. Consider all your options and make sure you find the one that best fits your needs and budget. You’ll be much happier in the long run if you dig deep in your search.